Approximate 4-5 month push, roughly 120-150 days, from the expected January window to the May 12 public launch.
Research Note
0/6 open
This is based on public-source facts plus market research from multiple sources. If a stronger alternative report exists, the numbers should move with the data.
14 public entries. 13 EdTech updates after launch. Ten updates hit before the Nov 21 stop. Then the record goes quiet for a 203-day gap, roughly half of the public window. The next visibly bigger public update lands after the mid-June ThriveWare turn.
Actual: May 2025-July 2026
14Public entries
13Updates after launch.
10Updates before the Nov 21 stop.
203Days quiet: Nov 21-Jun 12.
Growth Pace Target
20Updates
15-30Expected range over 14 months.
1-2Public releases per month.
4-8Weeks between meaningful improvements.
May 23-Nov 21, 2025: 10 visible updates before the gap. July and September are the public bursts.
Nov 21, 2025-Jun 12, 2026: roughly half of the 14-month public window is quiet.
Local ThriveWare name/registration context appears Jun 18. Four days later, the biggest visible public update lands.
Post-Launch Update Rhythm10 before stop / Dec-May zero
1May
0Jun
3Jul
1Aug
3Sep
1Oct
1Nov
0Dec-May
2Jun
1Jul
Most public notes read as bug fixes, performance work, UI changes, or minor listing work. Real work, but not steady growth-app expansion.
Only the Jun 22, 2026 listing clearly reads bigger: AI features, announcements, free trial, stability, and UI.
Benchmark ReadApp Store + Model
A 20-update target stays inside the 15-30 expected range for 14 months. The public record lands 7 short, about 35% under that target. The 203-day public silence is longer than the 120-day longest gap cited in one top-app update benchmark.
Release MixRelease Notes
Honest read: July and September are the visible public bursts. The App Store record does not show steady growth-mode work; it shows a November stop, a 203-day silence, and one larger post-gap release.
Bottom Line: For a tech division trying to grow, the count is light and the silence is the problem. A 203-day gap inside a 14-month public window makes the record look more like maintenance mode than steady product movement.
Pre-launch case anchor: use the exact May/Hilde wording only after the underlying source is attached.
1May 12, 20252.0.0 launch listing / bug fixes.after control context
2May 23, 20252.0.1 UI/UX, performance, fixes.
3Jul 8, 20252.0.2 UI/UX and performance refinements.
4Jul 17, 20252.1.0 performance improvements and bug fixes.
5Jul 19, 20252.2.0 homepage, reels, programs, video, performance, fixes.
6Aug 25, 20252.3.0 bug fixes.
7Sep 9, 20252.4.0 UI enhancements, performance, fixes.
8Sep 20, 20252.5.0 performance improvements and bug fixes.
9Sep 21, 20252.6.0 bug fixes and performance improvements.
10Oct 28, 20252.6.1 bug fixes.
11Nov 21, 20252.6.2 UI changes.updates stop here
203-day silence: after Nov 21, there are no visible App Store updates until Jun 12. That quiet period is the main performance story.
12Jun 12, 20262.7.0 bug fixes.203 days later
Jun 18, 2026 local anchor: the case file notes ThriveWare registration context. Four days later, the App Store shows the biggest visible substance in the public list.
13Jun 22, 20262.8.0 AI features, announcements, free trial, stability, UI.substance after ThriveWare
14Jul 3, 20262.8.1 bug fixes.post-gap bug fixes
A clean market read separates build, maintenance, and update work. These are benchmark ranges, not invoices.
Build Today$60kApprox current build cost
Build Then$120kHigh-end 2-4 years ago
Maintain Today$12-24k/yrAnnual operating model
Maintain Max$60k/yrHigh-end first-year model
Update Today$2-3kTypical minor update
Update Then$4-5kPast high-end max
Three Work Weeks13-26 developer days is about three work weeks before bigger features.
Growth ReadA growth-focused app should show roughly 20 meaningful update cycles, not just 13 public post-launch updates.
Benchmark OnlyMarket research context, not proof that every release was separately invoiced.
The useful price story is not just the final $215 number. The price concern was raised before launch, then the lower price still did not solve the product-depth issue.
Nate's Gold Glove
$297/year
VS
Nate's infield membership included team calendars, 5-Tool Training, College Fit List, and recruiting-system pieces.
Platform context: same Thinkific-style system Greg used for baseball/recruiting work, not the same Gold Glove product.
Trosky 365
$215/year
Current public pricing is $19.99/month or $214.99/year, rounded here to $20/month or $215/year.
That is about $57-82 less than a $297 Gold Glove year, depending on monthly versus yearly comparison.
Price timeline scroll sideways ->
Concept notes say the app was marketed around $500 with no discount, before the product had proven depth.
The concern was on the table while launch timing and team-tool expectations kept moving.
The public App Store listing now shows $19.99/month and $214.99/year.
The lower price does not erase the smaller feature set, team-tool gap, or flexibility issue.
Timeline moves left to right swipe / scroll ->
Scroll for all dates ->
- App first, team tools immediately after.
- Very doable features people wanted, similar in spirit to Nate's Shot Clock app.
- Back then: roughly $20k-$30k to build; smaller features about half now.
- Pricing was still unresolved.
- Detailed concepts and competitor-tool ideas were already visible.
- Some concepts could be standalone high-value businesses if built right.
- May 12 public launch instead of the expected January window: roughly 120-150 days later.
- Timelines moved and team tools still did not have a real plan.
- Wireframes and full design concepts were on the table.
- Team and camp tools did not compete with the current app.
- Ideas matched Trosky-style programs that already worked.
- Another year was effectively lost.
- The expectation was still a team-tool solution that made sense for everyone.
- Keep the point tight: the promise kept moving.
- The concept shifted from delayed to not being built.
- That is the core product-promise issue.
Demand context: the team side was described as 2-3x growth over the last year, with Nate's camps still strong and steady demand for uniforms, apparel, academy programs, and college recruiting. That makes the missing team-tool path look worse, not better.
Apple
App Store
Release Proof: 14 public entries plus $19.99/month and $214.99/year pricing.
A Alchemer
Cadence
Alchemer - Update Frequency Context
Cadence Context: top apps commonly release one to four updates per month.
IB Instabug
Gap
Instabug - Update Gap Benchmark
Gap Context: one top-app benchmark cites 120 days as the longest visible update gap in its sample.
Clutch
Avg $90k
Benchmark: reviewed mobile app projects average around $90k, with buckets reaching six figures.
GoodFirms
15%-25%
Benchmark: maintenance/support can run 15%-25% of original build cost.
Upwork
$160-$4.5k/mo
Maintenance context: post-launch work can run $160-$4.5k per month.
AWS
$100-$1k/mo
Operating context: cloud pricing is pay-as-you-go support, not fixed proof of spend.
D. Deloitte.
15%-25%
Deloitte - Technology Cost Context
Maintenance context: operating and maintenance cost as a share of original build cost.
McKinsey
20%-30%
Velocity context: better tooling can reduce build and update cost and improve iteration speed.
PTB
Concept
Concept Context: timeline narrative, Nate's Gold Glove comparison framing, and product-value notes.